- From: Chris Lilley via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 03 Nov 2021 15:36:28 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
> we resolved to add, roughly speaking, a technology() function to the src descriptor Defined in CSS Fonts 4: [11.1. Font technologies](https://drafts.csswg.org/css-fonts-4/#font-technology-definitions) and used in CSS Fonts 4: [4.3.1. Parsing the src descriptor](https://drafts.csswg.org/css-fonts-4/#font-face-src-parsing) >and an equivalent font-technology() function to `@supports` Defined in CSS Conditional 4: [2. Extensions to the @supports rule](https://drafts.csswg.org/css-conditional-4/#at-supports-ext) which links to the definitions in CSS Fonts 4 > We also resolved to open a bikeshedding issue to see if there's a better name for the function For the record, I think those names are _just fine_. In the context of `src` in `@font-face` there is no need for the `font-` prefix while in the general `@supports` there is; that difference aside, they should be exactly the same, which they currently are. `tech` is tempting, and I could live with it, but `technology` is probably better. -- GitHub Notification of comment by svgeesus Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/6791#issuecomment-959474063 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Wednesday, 3 November 2021 15:36:30 UTC