- From: Lea Verou via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 31 May 2021 17:47:44 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
> @LeaVerou I’m not totally opposed to reference different levels with something like `&1` or `&2`, but I submit that this results in a tighter coupling – whenever you change the nesting these references might break silently.
Oh that's a good point, we don't want that.
I wonder then if it should be explicit: You'd declare a name for the `&` in the ancestor scope that would allow you to reference it in descendants and how.
E.g. something like:
```css
.foo {
scope-name: bar;
& .bar {
&bar:focus .baz {
}
}
}
```
--
GitHub Notification of comment by LeaVerou
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/6330#issuecomment-851615137 using your GitHub account
--
Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Monday, 31 May 2021 17:47:57 UTC