- From: CSS Meeting Bot via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 12 May 2021 16:57:06 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
The CSS Working Group just discussed `[css-images] Consider making -webkit-image-set a parse-time alias to image-set`, and agreed to the following: * `RESOLVED: Make -webkit-image-set a parse time alias to image-set` <details><summary>The full IRC log of that discussion</summary> <dael> Topic: [css-images] Consider making -webkit-image-set a parse-time alias to image-set<br> <dael> github: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/6285<br> <dael> emilio: There's enough usage in the wild of -webkit-image-set it's worth supporting<br> <dael> emilio: Chromium engineers skeptical of getting rid of prefix. I think alias the 2 functions is easiest. webkit does some aliasing. -webkit-image-set serialized as unprefixed<br> <dael> emilio: I think right now wk limits the syntax for -webkit-image-set but they could just support whole thing. I think that's easiest way to spec it<br> <dael> TabAtkins: So long as it's reasonable to Chrome and WK people to accept full set I'm happy to put this in spec<br> <dael> smfr: Fine with that<br> <dael> rune: Without looking it much detail, sounds good<br> <dael> astearns: Prop: Make -webkit-image-set a parse time alias to image-set<br> <dael> astearns: Objections?<br> <dael> RESOLVED: Make -webkit-image-set a parse time alias to image-set<br> <dael> astearns: foolip mentions might be a problem with accepting full syntax, but can check<br> <dael> emilio: I think it's pretyt unlikely that [missed] but we can check<br> <dael> astearns: Might be possibility. Usage would be tiny and not sure side effect is awful<br> </details> -- GitHub Notification of comment by css-meeting-bot Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/6285#issuecomment-839940305 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Wednesday, 12 May 2021 16:57:08 UTC