- From: fantasai via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2021 18:20:55 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
Key point: a flex item that has `min-width: 0` has no minimum for flex shrinkage. Any constraints transferred through the aspect ratio have an effect on the minimum size only if they are applied via `min-width: auto` or `min-width: min-content` etc. They can still affect the flex base size also, if that is an automatic or content-based size, but they're not an independent minimum in the same way that `min-width` is. So the css-sizing-4 text is wrong here. -- GitHub Notification of comment by fantasai Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/6071#issuecomment-801307286 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Wednesday, 17 March 2021 18:20:57 UTC