Re: [csswg-drafts] Vendor prefix in <dashed-ident> (#6099)

Since single-dashed properties must have no public meaning, there would actually be no serious problem in making their values available to standard properties through `var()` in the same way double-dashed property values are. 

That’s not my main point, though, not my intent. It is rather, why should a handful of *browser (engine)* vendors have exclusive access to this namespace, when there is at least dozens, if not hundreds or even thousands of entities that would like to provide pseudo-constants as property–value pairs to millions of authors?

-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by Crissov
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/6099#issuecomment-800018322 using your GitHub account


-- 
Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config

Received on Tuesday, 16 March 2021 07:18:43 UTC