- From: Brian Birtles via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Sat, 13 Mar 2021 02:43:30 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
Oops, sorry about that. I think the intention was that it would be added to V&U as part of the edits @fantasai and I made there, but I guess I overlooked it. For what it's worth, [SMIL](https://www.w3.org/TR/2001/REC-smil-animation-20010904/#AnimationSandwichModel) has this: > Some attributes that support additive animation have a defined legal range for values (e.g., an opacity attribute may allow values between 0 and 1). In some cases, an animation function may yield out of range values. It is recommended that implementations clamp the results to the legal range as late as possible, before applying them to the presentation value. Ideally, the effect of all the animations active or frozen at a given point should be combined, before any clamping is performed. Although individual animation functions may yield out of range values, the combination of additive animations may still be legal. Clamping only the final result and not the effect of the individual animation functions provides support for these cases. Intermediate results may be clamped when necessary although this is not optimal. The host language must define the clamping semantics for each attribute that can be animated. -- GitHub Notification of comment by birtles Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/6097#issuecomment-797853158 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Saturday, 13 March 2021 02:43:32 UTC