- From: fantasai via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2021 21:34:45 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
Thanks @BorisChiou, I lost track of that bit. So we're currently in this unwinnable situation if I'm understanding correctly: * `min-height: auto` resolving to content-height while `min-height: min-content` resolving to aspect ratio height breaks “auto <= min-content” principle * `min-height: auto` and `min-height: min-content` resolving using AR and ignoring content breaks the “aspect ratio until too much content” use case * `min-height: auto` and `min-height: min-content` resolving to content-based height breaks the “min-content represents fit-content minimum” principle #5032 landed on breaking the first principle in favor of the second and third, but I'm not sure we actually thought about that explicitly... -- GitHub Notification of comment by fantasai Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/5721#issuecomment-797065005 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Thursday, 11 March 2021 21:34:47 UTC