Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-sizing] clarification around Compressible Replaced Elements and min-content size (#5665)

Oh, let me correct my statements about images and Firefox here: 

> E.g. The pass condition in https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/attachment.cgi?id=9201228 (as reported in https://crbug.com/1174924) is consistent with the current spec but not with any engine until Firefox 86 (current stable release).

Firefox 86 was the first engine to pass that test because previous Firefox versions compressed images, but not inputs. Chrome does the opposite: it compresses inputs, not images. @dholbert made the case in https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/5665#issuecomment-742108761 that we have to continue compressing inputs in flexbox's minimum content size algorithm for compat reasons, which I agree with.

But, the rest of my previous comment stands: I don't think we should make images compressible for the purpose of flexbox's minimum content size algorithm.

-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by davidsgrogan
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/5665#issuecomment-791682987 using your GitHub account


-- 
Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config

Received on Friday, 5 March 2021 20:56:13 UTC