- From: Ting-Yu Lin via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 03 Mar 2021 22:40:06 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
`flex-aspect-ratio-026.html` was written with the assumption that the flexbox's automatic minimum size rules has a higher priority over the aspect-ratio's. I didn't aware for non-replaced element, applying the flexbox's rule `min(transferred, content-based)` somewhat contradict to the outcome that the [aspect-ratio's automatic content-based min size](https://drafts.csswg.org/css-sizing-4/#aspect-ratio-minimum) is trying to produce. The proposed change -- non-replaced elements ignore any transferred preferred sizes for the purpose of automatic minimum sizing -- looks reasonable to me. (cc @dholbert) -- GitHub Notification of comment by aethanyc Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/6069#issuecomment-790123764 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Wednesday, 3 March 2021 22:40:07 UTC