- From: Lea Verou via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 02 Mar 2021 20:16:34 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
LeaVerou has just created a new issue for https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts: == [css-color-5] Commas in color-mix()? == Since various UAs are currently implementing, it's imperative that we finalize the syntax of `color-mix()` ASAP. I've done a fair bit of editing and clearing up of that section recently, and the current grammar looks like this (note that the adjusters have been removed per editor resolution): ``` color-mix( in <<colorspace>> && [ [ <<color>> && [ <<percentage>> ]? ] <<color>> ]) ``` Valid usage examples per this grammar: ```css color-mix(in lch red 20% white) color-mix(in lch 20% red white) color-mix(red 20% white in lch) color-mix(20% red white in lch) ``` Invalid usage examples: ```css color-mix(red in lch 20% white) color-mix(red 20% in lch white) color-mix(in lch red white 20%) ``` In previous versions of `color-mix()`, there were commas to separate the color space argument from the colors. After #6050 we resolved to remove that comma. However, since a comma is a "stronger" separator than a space, if we left the comma between colors, it would look as if the color space argument only applies to one of them: ```css color-mix(in lch red 20%, white) ``` So we removed that comma as well. While I would strongly object to having a comma only to separate the colors but not the color space from the colors, I think the previous all-comma syntax was actually more readable: ```css color-mix(in lch, red 20%, white) /* vs */ color-mix(in lch red 20% white) ``` OTOH this syntax allows for more flexibility in ordering the arguments. Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/6066 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Tuesday, 2 March 2021 20:16:37 UTC