Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-contain-3] container-name string vs ident (#6405) from Miriam Suzanne via GitHub on 2021-06-23 (public-css-archive@w3.org from June 2021)

From: Miriam Suzanne via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2021 19:24:35 +0000
To: public-css-archive@w3.org
Message-ID: <issue_comment.created-867098759-1624476273-sysbot+gh@w3.org>

By accepting a string, we allow attribute patterns like:

```css
[container-name] {
  container-name: attr(container-name);
}
```

I don't see that as a deal-breaker, but it does seem nice-to-have, and based on prior art?

-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by mirisuzanne
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/6405#issuecomment-867098759 using your GitHub account


-- 
Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config

Received on Wednesday, 23 June 2021 19:24:52 UTC