- From: Christopher Kirk-Nielsen via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2021 13:37:20 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
@jakearchibald I definitely like the proposal. Have you given thought to a different syntax, closer to `clip-path`'s `polygon()` with a comma separating each XY pair? I don't know of the implications but I know that the syntax has made it easier for me to debug paths (well, that and/or line breaks I suppose). I know [Amelia mentioned](https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/229#issuecomment-484309283) how folks with math backgrounds might prefer `x1,y1 x2,y2` but since we have the `polygon()` precedent, I'd imagine it'd be more familiar. Or maybe [make commas optional](https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/229#issuecomment-484956964) though I think it's nice to, at a glance, know if you're missing a coordinate in a pair. -- GitHub Notification of comment by chriskirknielsen Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/229#issuecomment-861505244 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Tuesday, 15 June 2021 13:37:39 UTC