Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-fonts] generic font families may vs should map to multiple concrete font families (#5053)

>  for generic font families that are meaningful across multiple scripts

>  we'd have to classify generics into "general-purpose generics" and "script-specific generics"

> we need to guard against the implicit bias that `latin-script-specific` === `general-purpose`.

This needs a concrete proposal for which generics are general purpose which is harder than it looks. Is `cursive` general purpose? Can we quietly kill `fantasy` in the same rewrite?


-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by svgeesus
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/5053#issuecomment-857881109 using your GitHub account


-- 
Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config

Received on Wednesday, 9 June 2021 17:16:15 UTC