- From: Ian Kilpatrick via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 09 Jun 2021 16:43:24 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
Specifically for the `aspect-ratio: none` case consider the following example: ``` <!DOCTYPE html> <div style="display: inline-grid; border: solid;"> <svg style="background: green;"></svg> </div> ``` https://www.software.hixie.ch/utilities/js/live-dom-viewer/?saved=9397 (FF seems to have a bug with above). Here the `<svg>` element has no aspect-ratio (set the width/height at the other dimension will stay the same size). This is how: ``` <!DOCTYPE html> <div style="display: inline-grid; border: solid;"> <img src=image style="aspect-ratio: none;"></svg> </div> ``` .... would behave. The element would still take up space by default - using its natural-size, but have no aspect-ratio. This might be desired! But isn't exactly what the use case is describing unless I'm mis-understanding. -- GitHub Notification of comment by bfgeek Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/6257#issuecomment-857859787 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Wednesday, 9 June 2021 16:46:08 UTC