Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-fonts] Add COLRv1 keyword to `<color-font-technology>` production (#6329)

> Note that a COLRv1 implementation must support COLRv0, so "COLR" does make some sense.

Until there is a COLRv2 which must support COLRv1 and COLRv0 and then we wish we hadn't used COLR.

The point is to be able to serve a COLRv0 font to an implementation that doesn't support COLRv1

> What did you think of the versioning syntax, @svgeesus?

See [above](https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/6329#issuecomment-855816954)

Speaking of versioning there is also , in OpenType 1.9, [a v0 and v1 of CPAL](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/typography/opentype/otspec190alpha/cpal). But I guess that isn't an issue.

-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by svgeesus
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/6329#issuecomment-855859909 using your GitHub account


-- 
Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config

Received on Monday, 7 June 2021 11:52:52 UTC