- From: Miriam Suzanne via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 20 Jul 2021 16:25:30 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
I don't see this as an issue specific to cascade layers, or one that layers need to solve. It is already possible for name-defining rules to override each other, and layers make it simpler to describe the _order_ in which they override each other. If the override is intentional, then layers are working as designed. If the override is _accidental_, then it's not a new problem specific to layering. It seems more like a namespace/scope issue. - If we want to add `!important` at-rules, I think that's an interesting idea, but somewhat tangential to this feature. - I would not like to add layer-scoped names. I think that approach blurs the goals. Layers are not a mechanism for locking in particular references to avoid conflicts (that's a scope issue), they are a mechanism for clearly defining an order of cascade precedence – which is working successfully in the example. Authors can move their animations into the appropriate layers so that the proper one is applied. -- GitHub Notification of comment by mirisuzanne Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/6461#issuecomment-883527162 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Tuesday, 20 July 2021 16:25:38 UTC