- From: Chris Lilley via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2021 15:44:08 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
Hi @SebastianZ Conversion to Bikeshed is a lot of work and can be error prone. For me, it was a low priority because 1. Fonts 3 is a W3C Recommendation, so we can't just make arbitrary changes to it, like with a WD or CR 2. _All_ of Fonts 3 is in Fonts 4, which is the current work, so any changes and corrections can be made there So yes, it will be useful to have a Bikeshed version of Fonts 3, provided that the generated result has no substantive or editorial differences compared to the existing Recommendation. -- GitHub Notification of comment by svgeesus Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/234#issuecomment-882653987 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Monday, 19 July 2021 15:44:10 UTC