W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-css-archive@w3.org > July 2021

Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-overflow-4] rename scrollbar-gutter:both (#6349)

From: CSS Meeting Bot via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
Date: Wed, 14 Jul 2021 16:54:03 +0000
To: public-css-archive@w3.org
Message-ID: <issue_comment.created-880053625-1626281642-sysbot+gh@w3.org>
The CSS Working Group just discussed `Scrollbar Styling`, and agreed to the following:

* `RESOLVED: Rename to 'both-edges'`

<details><summary>The full IRC log of that discussion</summary>
&lt;fantasai> Topic: Scrollbar Styling<br>
&lt;fantasai> github: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/6349<br>
&lt;astearns> ack fantasai<br>
&lt;Zakim> fantasai, you wanted to mention calendar widgets<br>
&lt;fantasai> florian: Some confusion over the name of 'both'<br>
&lt;fantasai> florian: Set of edits landed after a side-meeting, renamed it to 'mirror'<br>
&lt;fantasai> florian: Some people said maybe it should be 'both-sides' or 'both-edges'<br>
&lt;fantasai> florian: All of them are clearer than what we have now<br>
&lt;fantasai> florian: Current ED went with mirror because both clearer and short<br>
&lt;fantasai> florian: Anyone have any comments?<br>
&lt;fantasai> astearns: Minor preference for a longer one<br>
&lt;fantasai> florian: I prefer one I went with, but wouldn't object to switching either<br>
&lt;TabAtkins> I'm fine with "mirror" after some thought<br>
&lt;TabAtkins> it's grown on me<br>
&lt;bmathwig> +1 for both-edges<br>
&lt;fantasai> astearns: I think both-sides or both-edges is clearer, because "mirroring what?"<br>
&lt;fantasai> miriam: Any chance that we want 'inline' as part of the name? in case want block later?<br>
&lt;fantasai> florian: Would add it as a second value<br>
&lt;fantasai> florian: e.g. stable stable, or stable mirror<br>
&lt;fantasai> florian: So I wouldn't include in the keyword<br>
&lt;astearns> ack fantasai<br>
&lt;Zakim> fantasai, you wanted to ask if we're moving this to css-scrollbars-1?<br>
&lt;fantasai> fantasai: Weren't we planning to move to scrollbars spec?<br>
&lt;fantasai> florian: Had a resolution for it<br>
&lt;fantasai> florian: But had some issues to work out, wanted to work out prior to moving<br>
&lt;fantasai> florian: but I think we're getting there<br>
&lt;fantasai> smfr: I like both-sides or both-edges<br>
&lt;rachelandrew> +1 for both-<br>
&lt;Rossen_> prefer both-<br>
&lt;tantek> slight pref for both-*<br>
&lt;fantasai> ??: -edge makes more sense because of the scrollbars<br>
&lt;fantasai> ??: some people when thinking of sides think only of left and right<br>
&lt;tantek> agreed with that reasoning for "edge"<br>
&lt;jfkthame> +1 for both-edges<br>
&lt;fantasai> astearns: sounds like we're leaning towards 'both-edges'<br>
&lt;fantasai> astearns: Anyone object?<br>
&lt;fantasai> RESOLVED: Rename to 'both-edges'<br>
</details>


-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by css-meeting-bot
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/6349#issuecomment-880053625 using your GitHub account


-- 
Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Wednesday, 14 July 2021 16:54:05 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Tuesday, 5 July 2022 06:42:39 UTC