- From: fantasai via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 07 Jan 2021 22:21:59 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
@dholbert Wrt (1), yes that is correct. Wrt (2), not quite correct. `justify-self` and `align-self` don't change the static position itself, they change how the abspos is aligned within its inset-modified containing block. See https://drafts.csswg.org/css-position-3/#abspos-insets Wrt (3), yes I believe you are correct. The goal was to give abspos a more consistent and straightforward model, in which the inset-modified containing block is calculated possibly affected by the peculiarities of its static position containing block’s layout model; and then the abspos is laid out inside this rectangle the same way in all cases. That the align-self axis of a flex child can change depending on whether it is a flex item or an abspos does seem to fall out of that. :) If you think there might be some problem with making such changes, let us know! -- GitHub Notification of comment by fantasai Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1432#issuecomment-756423387 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Thursday, 7 January 2021 22:22:01 UTC