Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-syntax-3] At-rules and qualified rules allow simple blocks in prelude (#5766) from Tab Atkins Jr. via GitHub on 2021-02-26 (public-css-archive@w3.org from February 2021)

From: Tab Atkins Jr. via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2021 20:26:05 +0000
To: public-css-archive@w3.org
Message-ID: <issue_comment.created-786876078-1614371164-sysbot+gh@w3.org>

Curly braces in property values has, in fact, been proposed before as a way to more explicitly address the sub-parts of longhand properties, like

```
.foo {
  background: {image: url(...); color: red;};
}
```

It doesn't have the syntactic issues of curly-blocks in preludes, so what would make it "devastating to CSS parsers with nested syntax", @matthew-dean?

-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by tabatkins
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/5766#issuecomment-786876078 using your GitHub account


-- 
Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config

Received on Friday, 26 February 2021 20:26:11 UTC