- From: Miriam Suzanne via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2021 16:57:56 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
Right. Those were exactly my points. :) And I think they back up my argument that we can consider the `switch()` function & the `available-inline-size` value as two distinct features that work together – exactly like `calc()` and `var()` work today: 1. A math-like function that is entirely identical to `cond()` and works on ordinary values without IACVT 2. New values like `available-inline-size` which would be useful in a function like that (and maybe also on their own?), but would trigger IACVT One function can handle both `switch()` and `cond()` use-cases, depending what values are used for comparison. The need for IACVT is tied to the values, not to the function itself. -- GitHub Notification of comment by mirisuzanne Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/5009#issuecomment-785221213 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Wednesday, 24 February 2021 16:57:58 UTC