- From: Oriol Brufau via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Sat, 13 Feb 2021 00:03:27 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
Also, I guess that there should be a child or descendant combinator (or pseudo-element?) after `:stuck`. `+` or `~` are not enough because if `:stuck` can impact later siblings, they can affect the size of the containing block, which can affect whether the element is stuck. Alternatively, the containing block should also have size containment. And mixing with `:has()` should be invalid, or `:has(> :is(:stuck > *))` would bypass the restriction. -- GitHub Notification of comment by Loirooriol Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/5979#issuecomment-778520893 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Saturday, 13 February 2021 00:03:29 UTC