- From: Florian Rivoal via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 22 Dec 2021 08:47:34 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
Right. The `:*-within` family of pseudos mainly makes sense if `:has()` isn't expected to be implementable, otherwise it's syntactic sugar (unless the narrower version enables performance optimizations that the general mechanism doesn't). For the longest time, the assumption was indeed that `:has()` was not implementable in a performant way. It seems that [Safari is redefining expectations here](https://twitter.com/jensimmons/status/1473051429115940868), and that we may get `:has()` after all. -- GitHub Notification of comment by frivoal Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/3027#issuecomment-999395007 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Wednesday, 22 December 2021 08:47:35 UTC