- From: Chris Lilley via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2021 16:02:13 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
> I believe this font-tech declaration is not sufficient and we should allow authors express their preferences for a particular method of incremental font loading. I agree. All the rest of the `tech()` (and corresponding `font-tech()`) express author preferences and constitute client-led content negotiation. > Perhaps the tech(incremental) should be extended to allow tech(incremental-patch) and tech(incremental-range) be declared I would be fine with those names, which are consistent with the other hyphenated names used there.. -- GitHub Notification of comment by svgeesus Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/6892#issuecomment-995954028 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Thursday, 16 December 2021 16:02:15 UTC