- From: vmpstr via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2021 17:08:54 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
> Worst-case performance summary: > > * Forces style for non-skipped parts of the document > * Requires an ancestor tree walk for skipped elements up to a non-skipped ancestor I agree. Also note that even if we tie this function only to [being rendered](https://html.spec.whatwg.org/#being-rendered), the style update (of non-skipped parts) would still be required. I think the extra ancestor walk is a small price to pay to let developers reliably check and avoid computation in non-document-visible trees. Bikeshed: maybe isDocumentVisible instead of isVisibleToDocument? -- GitHub Notification of comment by vmpstr Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/6850#issuecomment-991144199 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Friday, 10 December 2021 17:08:56 UTC