Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-contain-3] Ancestor Layout Loops with Single-Axis Containment (#6426)

The CSS Working Group just discussed `Ancestor Layout Loops`, and agreed to the following:

* `RESOLVED: Accept draft text`
* `RESOLVED: FPWD Contain 3`

<details><summary>The full IRC log of that discussion</summary>
&lt;fantasai> Topic: Ancestor Layout Loops<br>
&lt;drott> thanks for taking that issue before the hour<br>
&lt;fantasai> github: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/6426<br>
&lt;fantasai> miriam: This has been the main blocking issue for Container Queries<br>
&lt;fantasai> miriam: defining exactly how single-axis containment should work<br>
&lt;fantasai> miriam: I think at this point narrowing that down to the [audio cut]<br>
&lt;fantasai> miriam: inline axis<br>
&lt;fantasai> miriam: potential worried about changes to block size impacting available inline size, creating a loop<br>
&lt;fantasai> miriam: iank proposed that these are not new issues, and we have existing solutions in CSS, and showed that some of these problems already exist<br>
&lt;fantasai> miriam: we wrote a draft spec<br>
&lt;fantasai> fantasai: Importantly, both IanK and dbaron signed off on the spec, so from my perspective it must be good enough for FPWD<br>
&lt;fantasai> florian: dbaron reviewed earlier version, did he re-review the updated version?<br>
&lt;fantasai> dbaron: Don't hold up on me<br>
&lt;fantasai> dbaron: I'll get to it<br>
&lt;chrishtr> (the updated version is basically the same as the previous version)<br>
&lt;drott> (I am out for the next half hour, possibly slightly longer)<br>
&lt;fantasai> florian: As far as I'm concerned, if dbaron's OK with it OK with me<br>
&lt;fantasai> astearns: So are we proposing to resolve on the draft text?<br>
&lt;fantasai> miriam: yes<br>
&lt;fantasai> fantasai: And also to publish FPWD<br>
&lt;fantasai> astearns: Anyone with concerns about resolving to accept the draft text?<br>
&lt;fantasai> astearns: anyone need more time to review?<br>
&lt;fantasai> RESOLVED: Accept draft text<br>
&lt;fantasai> astearns: since this was the last big issue that we wanted to solve before FPWD, next is proposed FPWD of CSS Contain 3<br>
&lt;fantasai> +!<br>
&lt;fantasai> +1<br>
&lt;fantasai> jensimmons: +1 to FPWD, keep seeing situations where not having a WD of this spec is creating problems<br>
&lt;chrishtr> +1<br>
&lt;fantasai> astearns: anyone with the opposite view?<br>
&lt;fantasai> florian: I was pushing back against this one until this issue was addressed, because unclear if we should publish FPWD without it, but with that cleared I'm good now<br>
&lt;fantasai> RESOLVED: FPWD Contain 3<br>
&lt;chrishtr> congratulations everyone, especially miriam!<br>
&lt;chrishtr> This is an awesome feature, and a huge milestone for the web.<br>
&lt;fantasai> &lt;astearns> +1, very happy to get into FPWD<br>
</details>


-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by css-meeting-bot
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/6426#issuecomment-988998375 using your GitHub account


-- 
Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config

Received on Wednesday, 8 December 2021 17:02:46 UTC