- From: CSS Meeting Bot via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 08 Dec 2021 16:20:48 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
The CSS Working Group just discussed `Snapshot 2021`, and agreed to the following: * `RESOLVED: Transforms 2 to "rough interop"` * `RESOLVED: other specs as proposed, except for Color 4 and overscroll-behavior` * `RESOLVED: Publish Snapshot 2021 as a NOTE after edits` <details><summary>The full IRC log of that discussion</summary> <fantasai> Topic: Snapshot 2021<br> <fantasai> github: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/6243<br> <fantasai> florian: fantasai and I prepared a draft for this year<br> <fantasai> florian: more or less identical to last year other than dates<br> <fantasai> florian: Went through list of specs to propose<br> <fantasai> florian: reminder there's 3 buckets<br> <fantasai> florian: Stable = things that are REC or almost REC<br> <fantasai> florian: Rough Interop = roughly interoperable, but spec is in rough shape and lots of issues, but things are shipping<br> <fantasai> florian: Awaiting Implementations = spec is "done" as far as can be without implementation work, but don't have enough implementation to know if stable yet<br> <fantasai> florian: We've made a list of some things that might go into the 2021 snapshot<br> <fantasai> florian: First is, Lists 3 specification<br> <fantasai> florian: Other than the marker-side property, seems that everything is implemented even though spec is not completely finished, not that far away<br> <fantasai> florian: so is that one ready for Rough Interop?<br> <fantasai> florian: Next is Counter Styles 3, seems ready for Stable (Official Definition)<br> <fantasai> florian: Logical Properties should be in "rough interop"<br> <fantasai> florian: One we have a question, what is the status of "overscroll-behavior", should it be in "rough interop" or not yet?<br> <fantasai> florian: Next is css-position-3, seems to be "rough interop"<br> <fantasai> florian: Scrollbars 1 now CR should be in "Awaiting Implementations" bucket<br> <fantasai> florian: css-sizing-3 in Rough Interop<br> <fantasai> florian: Another question: what's status of resize-observer? Should it go into "rough interop"?<br> <jensimmons> q+<br> <fantasai> florian: Same question for Web Animations 1<br> <chris> https://test.csswg.org/harness/results/css-fonts-4_dev/grouped/<br> <astearns> ack jensimmons<br> <fantasai> astearns: Also suggestion for css-fonts-4 to "rough interop"<br> <fantasai> astearns: and css-color-4 to ???<br> <astearns> s/???/official/<br> <fantasai> jensimmons: Spec considering in Interop 2022, which is cross-browser effort to focus on testing and interop fixes<br> <fantasai> jensimmons: overscroll-behavior<br> <fantasai> florian: Does it mean that after next year it will be in "rough interop"?<br> <fantasai> jensimmons: No I think now<br> <fantasai> emilio: ...<br> <fantasai> emilio: propagation from the body<br> <fantasai> emilio: basically Blink implements the spec wrong<br> <fantasai> emilio: in order to make it work on Blink, you have to set it on BODY and for everyone need to set it on root<br> <chris> https://test.csswg.org/harness/results/css-color-4_dev/grouped/<br> <fantasai> emilio: *other* than that it's roughly interoperable<br> <chris> q+<br> <chris> sigh no audio<br> <chris> on irc<br> <chris> are suggestions for color 4 and fonts 4 accepted?<br> <fantasai> <fantasai> I think color 4 should go to CR first before going official; Fonts 4 to rough interop seems fine<br> <fantasai> smfr: I would hold off on overscroll-behavior<br> <fantasai> astearns: OK, overscroll-behavior off the list<br> <fantasai> astearns: css-sizing-3?<br> <chris> q+<br> <fantasai> astearns: should we push it down to rough interop? It's currently in stable but not CR<br> <astearns> ack chris<br> <fantasai> chris: Color 4 should be in CR<br> <fantasai> chris: have shipping implementations, lots of interp<br> <fantasai> chris: anachronistic to link to Color 3<br> <chris> \o/<br> <chris> 7 open issues<br> <fantasai> florian: Still have open issues, not a lot, but right now at 7<br> <fantasai> florian: so certainly qualifies under the 2nd bucket, but official definition, maybe not so much<br> <fantasai> fantasai: I would prefer to wait until next year. Top bucket specs should be in CR or later.<br> <fantasai> astearns: ???<br> <fantasai> astearns: Anyone with opinions about resize-observer or web animations?<br> <chris> ok, agreed re color-4<br> <fantasai> smfr: Both of those into rough interop<br> <fantasai> astearns: anyone disagree?<br> <fantasai> astearns: OK, I think we're at consensus for the list of things in the issue.<br> <fantasai> astearns: What about Transforms 2?<br> <florian> s/???/take sizing to rough interop for the same reasons/<br> <fantasai> astearns: It was suggested to add it to stable last year?<br> <fantasai> fantasai: It's pretty rough, should go into rough interop.<br> <fantasai> smfr: sgtm<br> <fantasai> dbaron: There are many pieces not interoperable and many pieces that are, so sounds good to me<br> <dbaron> s/many pieces not/some pieces not/<br> <fantasai> astearns: My suggested resolution is to take all of the suggested edits, including moving transforms 2 to rough interop, except for color 4 and overscroll-behavior<br> <fantasai> RESOLVED: Transforms 2 to "rough interop"<br> <chris> +1<br> <fantasai> RESOLVED: other specs as proposed, except for Color 4 and overscroll-behavior<br> <fantasai> astearns: Proposed to publish Snapshot 2021 as a Note<br> <fantasai> RESOLVED: Publish Snapshot 2021 as a NOTE after edits<br> <fantasai> astearns: How much time until end of year publishing moratorium?<br> <fantasai> florian: Should be fine, will be done quickly<br> </details> -- GitHub Notification of comment by css-meeting-bot Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/6243#issuecomment-988962809 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Wednesday, 8 December 2021 16:20:50 UTC