- From: Bramus! via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2021 21:32:33 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
Thanks for the clarifications on that, @mirisuzanne. Think I get it now:
```css
/* EXAMPLE 31 */
@layer default;
@import url(theme.css) layer(theme);
@layer components; /* 👈 This @layer statement here will make all subsequent @import rules be ignored. In this example however there are none */
@layer default {
audio[controls] {
display: block;
}
}
```
I see that in https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/commit/d9fdc1e6a7454913783e5fc6267c12b5a7c7b9b5 you changed the text to “A ''@layer'' rule that comes after …”. More precise would be “A ''@layer'' statement at-rule that comes after …”?
---
Winging back to “the @layer block at-rule” described just above it. There it reads in a note:
> Note: @layer block at-rules cannot be interleaved with @import rules.
Is that 1 @import rule in between two @layers block at-rules? If so, I somewhat read between the lines that best practice that's being hinted at is to:
1. Establish a layer order upfront using `@layer` statement at-rules
1. Group your `@import`s after that
1. Append styles to already established layers using `@layer` block at-rules
Would that be something to recommend people to do?
---
_(Apologies if I'm asking too many stupid questions regarding this. Trying to understand things correctly here. Perhaps some code-examples of what is meant by all those limitations could help? In css-nesting-1 for example I see a lot of these “wrong examples“ with an explanation of what exactly is wrong added to them.)_
--
GitHub Notification of comment by bramus
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/6522#issuecomment-909657652 using your GitHub account
--
Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Tuesday, 31 August 2021 21:32:35 UTC