- From: Jake Archibald via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 23 Aug 2021 08:15:40 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
I've updated the initial comment to reflect feedback. I've changed the spec to follow, and made it less algorithmic as @tabatkins suggested. I hope it still makes sense! I guess it would benefit from diagrams like I've included in the OP. > * Speaking of which, does the spec need to define how the second `<<number>>` is calculated when not specified? And the serialization of the function? Yes, I'm not really sure how to write that down, but we need something that converts the notation into a set of points. Also, `calculate linear output progress` needs connected up so it's actually used. I tried to copy the syntax from `linear-gradient`, but I couldn't see where things like `yellow 40% 60%` are allowed. I'm looking at [the syntax](https://drafts.csswg.org/css-images-3/#typedef-color-stop-list), but I can't see how it allows three values > Secondly, an even more pedantic point just to get this out of the way, @fantasai once taught me that it's helpful to break up lines quite a bit, roughly one line per clause so that it makes it easier to follow the blame log later. I've given this a go (although I generally find it more of an authoring burden vs any later benefit). However, it isn't the style used throughout the rest of the document. -- GitHub Notification of comment by jakearchibald Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/pull/6533#issuecomment-903545233 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Monday, 23 August 2021 08:15:42 UTC