W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-css-archive@w3.org > August 2021

Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-easing-1] Some ideas for linear() easing (#6533)

From: Brian Birtles via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
Date: Sat, 21 Aug 2021 13:50:07 +0000
To: public-css-archive@w3.org
Message-ID: <issue_comment.created-903119188-1629553805-sysbot+gh@w3.org>
> Input progress value is an [existing term](https://drafts.csswg.org/css-easing/#input-progress-value). "Position value" isn't in this proposal or the existing spec. Might be easier to make a comment against a particular line in the PR?

Sorry I didn't realise this was a PR! I was just responding to the first comment here which I thought was the proposal and which uses terms like "position value". I'll have to look at the PR next week.

-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by birtles
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/pull/6533#issuecomment-903119188 using your GitHub account


-- 
Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Saturday, 21 August 2021 13:50:09 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thursday, 24 March 2022 20:27:26 UTC