- From: CSS Meeting Bot via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2021 16:15:18 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
The CSS Working Group just discussed `[css-fonts] bikeshedding name of size-adjust descriptor`, and agreed to the following: * `RESOLVED: No change to name; stay with size-adjust` <details><summary>The full IRC log of that discussion</summary> <dael> Topic: [css-fonts] bikeshedding name of size-adjust descriptor<br> <dael> github: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/6114<br> <dael> chrishtr: One option is keeping the name. I think fantasai prefers that<br> <dael> chrishtr: Another option is font-scaling or font-scaling-factor<br> <dael> chrishtr: Opinions?<br> <dael> fantasai: I prefer original name<br> <dael> chrishtr: I'm okay with all of those<br> <dael> chrishtr: JonathanNeal and myles weighed in<br> <dael> jfkthame: I prefer name with scaling but can live<br> <dael> leaverou: I don't know about scaling. [missed]<br> <dael> fantasai: Proposed name is size-adjust which ties into font adjust. Work a bit differently but do exactly the same thing<br> <leaverou_> s/I don't know about scaling. [missed]/What about scaling-factor? font- is not needed if this is a descriptor in @font-face/<br> <dael> fantasai: size-adjust descripton on @fontface gives you descriptor to adjust font size by that much. font-size-adjust property takes a number of how big to scale to match x-height<br> <dael> fantasai: Proposals to expand beyond x-height to try and get fonts to match and normalize on metrics you request.<br> <dael> fantasai: Both scale used size instead of impacting computed<br> <dael> fantasai: Other reason was I figured pretty accurately represents what you're tryring to do when you spec a font and size<br> <dael> Rossen_: Way I read the thread most folks lean toward font-scale as rename. Propo by jfkthame and okay by chrishtr and myles<br> <dael> Rossen_: In description you used fantasai you used scale 80% of timeand adjust once. font-scal sounds like pretty awesome alternative. Should we try and resolve on that?<br> <dael> plinss: If we have existing prop that does same it makes sense to keep the name<br> <dael> jfkthame: What troubles me is it does it in a different way and hte value given has a different meaning. That's source of my unease with keeping names close<br> <Rossen_> s/font-scal/font-scale/<br> <dael> fantasai: There's syntax valid in font-size-adjust and ones in font-adjust and don't overlap. If we add % it should do the same. If we want a feature that's where it should go and size-adjust would be a subset of font-size-adjust<br> <dael> Rossen_: We can do one of two things. Hearing a split. We can straw poll between size-adjust and font-scale and take the result<br> <smfr> there’s also [-webkit-]text-size-adjust<br> <dael> chrishtr: sgtm<br> <Rossen_> A - size-adjust<br> <Rossen_> B - font-scale<br> <dael> Rossen_: options ^<br> <fantasai> A<br> <myles> abstain<br> <plinss> a<br> <dael> Rossen_: Please cast your options, A or B<br> <jfkthame> B<br> <Rossen_> B A<br> <rachelandrew> A<br> <chrishtr> AB<br> <dholbert> B<br> <astearns> abstain<br> <smfr> B<br> <Morgan> abstain<br> <futhark> abstain<br> <florian> abstain<br> <cbiesinger> abstain<br> <dael> Rossen_: I love that abstain has a and b<br> <dael> Rossen_: This is very non-conclusive<br> <dael> chrishtr: A bit more B than A<br> <dael> Rossen_: 5 and 5. That's not enough for consensus<br> <dael> Rossen_: Since there's no consensus, I don't hear strong reason to change<br> <dael> chrishtr: Can I make suggestion? Is there anyone who would object to leaving it the way it is?<br> <dael> Rossen_: That was going to be my proposal too<br> <dael> Rossen_: And if needed this can be brought back<br> <dael> Rossen_: Prop: No change to name, stay with size-adjust<br> <dael> smfr: No obj but then we have size-adjust font-soze-adjust and prefix text-size-adjust which is things with similar names doing different things<br> <dael> Rossen_: Based on WG votes we don't see to want to change strongly. Forcing a resolution and if people have strong opinions we can bring it back<br> <dael> Rossen_: Are there objections?<br> <dael> RESOLVED: No change to name; stay with size-adjust<br> <dael> Rossen_: Please engage in issue if want further discussion<br> </details> -- GitHub Notification of comment by css-meeting-bot Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/6114#issuecomment-828585846 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Wednesday, 28 April 2021 16:15:20 UTC