- From: Michael C. via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 26 Apr 2021 05:59:25 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
> It seems like it is very often that not everyone knows exactly what is being proposed since there are three things that are linear about a linear gradient. That's confused me a number of times, where I wanted to propose a simple `ease-gradient([direction & color stops])` syntax. Then my brain kept on kicking back into gear to remind me that the "linear" in `linear-gradient()` purely refers to the visual shape/direction of the gradient, not how it transitions from color stop to color stop. We can know this because the other existing gradient syntaxes are `repeating-linear-gradient()`, `radial-gradient()`, `repeating-radial-gradient()`, and the ever-elusive `conic-gradient()`—all of which describe the shape/direction of the gradient. :) -- GitHub Notification of comment by proimage Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1332#issuecomment-826528582 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Monday, 26 April 2021 05:59:27 UTC