W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-css-archive@w3.org > September 2020

Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-sizing-4][css-contain] Clarify on specifying aspect-ratio and contain:size on replaced elements (#5550)

From: Dima Voytenko via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2020 16:26:13 +0000
To: public-css-archive@w3.org
Message-ID: <issue_comment.created-699025460-1601051172-sysbot+gh@w3.org>
I also think it should 100x100. Just based on the `aspect-ratio: 1/1`. I don't know fully the nuances of how `contain: size` is applied. But I think perhaps, without width/height attributes and no `contain-intrinsic-size` specified, it could be just possible to define this case as "unknown intrinsic size" where the explicit `aspect-ratio` wins out, but we lose some of the derivatives from the intrinsic size, such as min-width computations?

GitHub Notification of comment by dvoytenko
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/5550#issuecomment-699025460 using your GitHub account

Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Friday, 25 September 2020 16:26:16 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Tuesday, 5 July 2022 06:42:17 UTC