- From: Chris Lilley via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2020 15:13:34 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
> (The geek in me quite likes the idea of font-optical-sizing: <number> as originally proposed here, though I would be inclined to argue that 1.0 should mean that CSS points -- rather than pixels -- are equated to opsz units, and the default macOS browser behavior would be equivalent to font-optical-sizing: 1.33333. But I'm not sure there's really a compelling case for the extra flexibility.) I too like the extra flexibility, and also the opportunity to reliably encode the Mac tradeoff with an explicit value. But mainly because this is indeed a variable axis, and authors may choose to prefer a heavier/lower-contrast or lighter/higher-contrast rendering for a specific face, than the font designer provides by default. In the same way that they may prefer a weight of 650 for bold or 424 for book, compared to what the font designer picked as a default. -- GitHub Notification of comment by svgeesus Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/4430#issuecomment-697519564 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Wednesday, 23 September 2020 15:13:36 UTC