- From: Javier Fernandez Garcia-Boente via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2020 10:33:21 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
Hi florian, Despite we have closed this issue, which I agree with the resolution, I'm not sure the changes in the test reflected what we have resolved; it may be possible I haven't understood it correctly, so I'd appreciate this get clarified before I reopen it, or maybe better create a new issue. The test I'm talking about is [trailing-ideographic-space-001.html ](https://github.com/web-platform-tests/wpt/blob/master/css/css-text/white-space/trailing-ideographic-space-001.html). There is a comment in that test precisely stating that the trailing ideographic space, which is hanging, should not extend the width of its parent, which has max-content width. However, this trailing ideographic space is followed by a forced-break, so If I understood correctly what the spec dictates, it should [conditionally hang](https://drafts.csswg.org/css-text-3/#conditionally-hang), which means that it should account for it's parent's max-content width. > Glyphs that conditionally hang are not taken into account when computing min-content sizes and any sizes derived thereof, but they are taken into account for max-content sizes and any sizes derived thereof. -- GitHub Notification of comment by javifernandez Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/4180#issuecomment-694145870 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Thursday, 17 September 2020 10:33:23 UTC