- From: Sebastian Zartner via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2020 18:03:32 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
I am slightly inclined to only allowing combinations with additional values as it pushes authors to read a bit about the values, as @TimVevida wrote, it's logically a bit cleaner, and because there are no other properties with such duplications. The syntax would then be ``` none | [ strict || style ] | [ content || size || style ] | [ size || layout || style || paint ] ``` Sebastian -- GitHub Notification of comment by SebastianZ Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/5506#issuecomment-691236909 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Friday, 11 September 2020 18:04:54 UTC