- From: Tab Atkins Jr. via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2020 16:42:47 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
Hm, indeed. I think the example is useful - being able to say "everything that `strict` does, plus `style` containment" seems reasonable, which is presumably why I wrote the example that way in the first place. ^_^ So I'm inclined to allow combination. Further questions, then: * do we want to be strict about combining the shorthands *only* with additional values? That is, would `strict size` be valid (equivalent to just `strict`) or invalid? I'm inclined to say it's fine, but I could go either way. Saying it's invalid is *slightly* annoying to specify in the grammar, but not too bad. * if we rule that the previous question is "it's valid", is it okay to repeat the same keyword, like `size size`? I'm inclined to say no, that's a clearer error. -- GitHub Notification of comment by tabatkins Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/5506#issuecomment-690481668 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Thursday, 10 September 2020 16:42:48 UTC