Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-text-3] Normatively disallow break-word (#4087)

Discussed this offline with @sideshowbarker (a while back, only remembering it now), and this is not so much an issue about css-text-3 specifically, but rather a more generic meta question: css should define and use consistent terminology for words like "deprecated", "obsolete", and other similar terms.

Here are some of the possible meanings for such words (non exhaustive list):
1. Using this is a bad idea (but if you do, here's how it works)
2. this is an old bad name/API for a useful thing which has a new good name/API. Use the new one if you can, be mindful of compat.
3. This is going away, don't count on it being there, or on continuing to do anything

I think, at present, CSS specs have some cases of 1 (, some cases of 2 ( I can't quite tell if is 1 or 3. We call all these "deprecated".

Should we clean up our terminology to account for this nuance? Is there some systematic (and formally defined) existing use of these words by other groups we could align to?

Note that this is about individual features, and is different from obsoleting / superseding / rescinding entire specifications. That's clearly defined [in the Process](

GitHub Notification of comment by frivoal
Please view or discuss this issue at using your GitHub account

Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in

Received on Thursday, 3 September 2020 05:56:13 UTC