- From: CSS Meeting Bot via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 02 Sep 2020 23:54:15 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
The CSS Working Group just discussed `[css-values] Add url() alias that does not accept unquoted URLs`, and agreed to the following: * `RESOLVED: Rename fetch() to src()` <details><summary>The full IRC log of that discussion</summary> <dael> Topic: [css-values] Add url() alias that does not accept unquoted URLs<br> <TabAtkins> https://drafts.csswg.org/css-values/#urls<br> <dael> github: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/541<br> <dael> TabAtkins: About 4 years ago took a resolution to add alias of url that only accepts strings. Right now url parsing you can't provide url via a function. Can't pull from attr etc.<br> <dael> TabAtkins: Finally added it in. It's trvial spec text. Idential to url but without special parsing. Added explaination as why it exists.<br> <dael> TabAtkins: Name is only question. I speced as fetch(). I don't care what we name it as long as it's not uri(). Good to hear other ideas or if people like fetch. Need to resolve on a name so we can call this done<br> <ericwilligers> We can use href as it is used in SVG<br> <florian> +1 to src<br> <dael> fantasai: I like src. href and location aren't good. location is too long and href it's not about hypertext<br> <florian> -1 to [u|i]ri<br> <dael> Rossen_: Between fetch and src<br> <dael> Rossen_: Which do we lean toward? fantasai votes src and florian +1<br> <plinss> +1 src<br> <dael> Rossen_: Objections to name it src?<br> <dael> RESOLVED: Rename fetch() to src()<br> <dael> Rossen_: Do we need to republish?<br> <dael> TabAtkins: Soon, but needs review first<br> </details> -- GitHub Notification of comment by css-meeting-bot Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/541#issuecomment-686130537 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Wednesday, 2 September 2020 23:54:16 UTC