W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-css-archive@w3.org > September 2020

Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-inline-3] leading-trim through to descendant line boxes (#5237)

From: CSS Meeting Bot via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
Date: Wed, 02 Sep 2020 23:47:20 +0000
To: public-css-archive@w3.org
Message-ID: <issue_comment.created-686120226-1599090439-sysbot+gh@w3.org>
The CSS Working Group just discussed `[css-inline-3] leading-trim through to descendant line boxes`, and agreed to the following:

* `RESOLVED: Accept the proposed text`
* `RESOLVED: Rename the property from leading-trim to trim-leading`

<details><summary>The full IRC log of that discussion</summary>
&lt;dael> Topic: [css-inline-3] leading-trim through to descendant line boxes<br>
&lt;dael> github: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/5237<br>
&lt;dael> fantasai: WG wanted to reconfirm<br>
&lt;fantasai>  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/5237#issuecomment-673312639<br>
&lt;dael> fantasai: I left it as first formatted line and no interveneing non-0 padding or borders. Whatever we take for margin we should take here. This is the current text<br>
&lt;fantasai> s/Whatever/whatever clarifications/<br>
&lt;dael> dholbert: one question [missed]<br>
&lt;dael> dholbert: If you have an inline level span with a border sounds like that would cause the leading trim to be excldued. I think intent was only block level<br>
&lt;dael> fantasai: You're trimming the line's leading to the text of root inline box which is by definition unstyled. We can clarify that<br>
&lt;dael> smfr: Are we stuck with name?<br>
&lt;dael> fantasai: no<br>
&lt;drousso_> +1 to name change<br>
&lt;dael> smfr: Can we cal it trim-leading? I think people will read it as leading trim not leading trim<br>
&lt;astearns> OK with name change<br>
&lt;dael> Rossen_: Any reasons why we shouldn't do that?<br>
&lt;TabAtkins> We don't usually do verbs, but this is a confusing term in the first place.<br>
&lt;dael> plinss: Not opposed but I think it'll have the same problem with trim-leading<br>
&lt;dael> fantasai: I'm also open to other terms. That's the first one we came up with<br>
&lt;TabAtkins> ledding<br>
&lt;dael> Rossen_: WE can resolve on the rename. What about proposed definition? Can we resolve on that?<br>
&lt;dael> Rossen_: Objections?<br>
&lt;dael> RESOLVED: Accept the proposed text<br>
&lt;dael> Rossen_: Rename to trim-leading. Objections?<br>
&lt;dael> RESOLVED: Rename the property from leading-trim to trim-leading<br>

GitHub Notification of comment by css-meeting-bot
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/5237#issuecomment-686120226 using your GitHub account

Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Wednesday, 2 September 2020 23:47:21 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Tuesday, 5 July 2022 06:42:15 UTC