W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-css-archive@w3.org > September 2020

Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-images-4] Queries for image support (#656)

From: CSS Meeting Bot via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
Date: Wed, 02 Sep 2020 23:29:16 +0000
To: public-css-archive@w3.org
Message-ID: <issue_comment.created-686093600-1599089355-sysbot+gh@w3.org>
The CSS Working Group just discussed `[mediaqueries] Queries for image support`, and agreed to the following:

* `RESOLVED: Republish Images 4`

<details><summary>The full IRC log of that discussion</summary>
&lt;dael> Topic: [mediaqueries] Queries for image support<br>
&lt;dael> github:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/656<br>
&lt;dael> TabAtkins: This one is me<br>
&lt;dael> TabAtkins: This is in fact a CSS Iages topic.<br>
&lt;dael> TabAtkins: Some time ago had resolution to have image set discriminate on format. I added that into spec<br>
&lt;dael> TabAtkins: Let me add a link ^<br>
&lt;dael> TabAtkins: Alongside resolution you can pass a type function that spec a mime type. Same as picture.element in html. Skipped if invalid. Has no effect on image.<br>
&lt;dael> TabAtkins: Questions, does this look good?<br>
&lt;dael> TabAtkins: Second is aI used type function but fontface uses format function for similar. Should I make html or fontface?<br>
&lt;dael> fantasai: fontface jsut uses arbitrary keywords, right?<br>
&lt;dael> myles: Yes<br>
&lt;florian> seems fine to use type()<br>
&lt;fantasai> s/jsut/doesn't uses MIME types, but/<br>
&lt;dael> TabAtkins: Weakens the argument. Then I guess use type.<br>
&lt;dael> TabAtkins: Does this look fine to everybody? This would go into Images 4. It's a WD. If it looks good I want to republish Images<br>
&lt;dael> florian: lgtm. One question. As we mentioned this was tagged as MQ. Is that b/c initial request was to have a MQ and you're proposing this?<br>
&lt;dael> TabAtkins: Separate thread I could not find. I was mistaken and grabbed this. We have one elsewhere to do what I explained. I found this first and didn't go find the right issue<br>
&lt;dael> florian: So this resolution doesn't have any relevence to if we need MQ<br>
&lt;dael> TabAtkins: Right<br>
&lt;dael> Rossen_: So you're just looking for draft republish?<br>
&lt;dael> TabAtkins: Yes. General confirm this is fine and a resolution to repub<br>
&lt;dael> Rossen_: Anyone feel this is not in right direction?<br>
&lt;dael> Rossen_: If not we'll resolve to republish<br>
&lt;dael> RESOLVED: Republish Images 4<br>

GitHub Notification of comment by css-meeting-bot
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/656#issuecomment-686093600 using your GitHub account

Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Wednesday, 2 September 2020 23:29:18 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Tuesday, 5 July 2022 06:42:15 UTC