Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-color-3] opacity should use <<number>> not <<alphavalue>> “which is syntactically a <<number>>” (#3139) from Amelia Bellamy-Royds via GitHub on 2020-09-01 (public-css-archive@w3.org from September 2020)

From: Amelia Bellamy-Royds via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
Date: Tue, 01 Sep 2020 16:47:13 +0000
To: public-css-archive@w3.org
Message-ID: <issue_comment.created-684992471-1598978831-sysbot+gh@w3.org>

I don't see any problem with continuing to define `<alphavalue>` as an intermediate syntax for the specs. Animations should still be fine.

The fact that it is now a union of two types makes it much more useful to continue to have a shorthand syntax.

-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by AmeliaBR
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/3139#issuecomment-684992471 using your GitHub account


-- 
Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config

Received on Tuesday, 1 September 2020 16:47:14 UTC