Re: [csswg-drafts] [selectors] What is the reasoning for ignoring defaullt namespaces only on the subject for :is() / :where() / :not()? (#5684) from Emilio Cobos Álvarez via GitHub on 2020-10-29 (public-css-archive@w3.org from October 2020)

From: Emilio Cobos Álvarez via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2020 18:59:53 +0000
To: public-css-archive@w3.org
Message-ID: <issue_comment.created-718957068-1603997992-sysbot+gh@w3.org>

I guess the idea is that the default namespace for the compound has already been applied to the left of the `:is` effectively?

-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by emilio
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/5684#issuecomment-718957068 using your GitHub account


-- 
Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config

Received on Thursday, 29 October 2020 18:59:54 UTC