W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-css-archive@w3.org > October 2020

Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-pseudo-4] ::selection vs ::inactive-selection (#4579)

From: CSS Meeting Bot via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2020 17:00:24 +0000
To: public-css-archive@w3.org
Message-ID: <issue_comment.created-715461159-1603472422-sysbot+gh@w3.org>
The CSS Working Group just discussed `::selection vs ::inactive-selection`, and agreed to the following:

* `RESOLVED: Remove ::inactive-selection from Pseudo 4, and add an issue on MQ to add an active-window media feature`

<details><summary>The full IRC log of that discussion</summary>
&lt;TabAtkins> Topic: ::selection vs ::inactive-selection<br>
&lt;TabAtkins> github: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/4579<br>
&lt;masonfreed> tantek, thanks. I think.<br>
&lt;TabAtkins> fantasai: We'd talkeda bout replacing the selection/inactive-selection distinction with a MQ for whether th eparent window is inactive<br>
&lt;TabAtkins> fantasai: So question is if we're actually doing that, should I remove ::inactive-selection from Pseudo and open an MQ issue?<br>
&lt;TabAtkins> florian: Seems good, but it seemed there was an active question about how much nuance there is about active vs inactive iframes?<br>
&lt;TabAtkins> fantasai: It seemed commented that we could get by with just the two, but we can make this an issue for the WG.<br>
&lt;GameMaker> q+<br>
&lt;TabAtkins> TabAtkins: Since impls dont' have ::inactive-seelction anyway, we can decide that later?<br>
&lt;Rossen_> ack GameMaker<br>
&lt;tantek> s/seelction/selection<br>
&lt;TabAtkins> GameMaker: Looking at the PDF at the bottom, I made a comparison of all browsers<br>
&lt;TabAtkins> GameMaker: Can't recall exact thoughts at the time, but based on these results, I was fine with making a MQ<br>
&lt;Rossen_> q?<br>
&lt;TabAtkins> Rossen_: So what's the proposed resolution?<br>
&lt;TabAtkins> fantasai: Removed ::inactive-selection from Pseudo 4, and add an issue on MQ to add an active-window media feature<br>
&lt;TabAtkins> Rossen_: Objections?<br>
&lt;tantek> s/talkeda bout/talked about<br>
&lt;TabAtkins> florian_irc: Are we removing it while we're thinking about it, and it's gone? Or will we maybe put it back?<br>
&lt;TabAtkins> florian_irc: Asking because we have tests for this - should I mark as tentative, or delete?<br>
&lt;TabAtkins> fantasai: Mark as tentative until we're totally finished on this issue. Good chance we can just revise later<br>
&lt;TabAtkins> RESOLVED: Remove ::inactive-selection from Pseudo 4, and add an issue on MQ to add an active-window media feature<br>
</details>


-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by css-meeting-bot
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/4579#issuecomment-715461159 using your GitHub account


-- 
Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Friday, 23 October 2020 17:00:25 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Tuesday, 5 July 2022 06:42:21 UTC