W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-css-archive@w3.org > October 2020

Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-display][css-pseudo] Is ::marker created by display:list-item or does it always exist? (#1793)

From: CSS Meeting Bot via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2020 16:48:23 +0000
To: public-css-archive@w3.org
Message-ID: <issue_comment.created-715455489-1603471702-sysbot+gh@w3.org>
The CSS Working Group just discussed `Existence of ::marker::marker`, and agreed to the following:

* `RESOLVED: ::marker::marker is invalid`
* `RESOLVED: accept proposal above`

<details><summary>The full IRC log of that discussion</summary>
&lt;fantasai> Topic: Existence of ::marker::marker<br>
&lt;fantasai> github: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1793<br>
&lt;fantasai> https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1793#issuecomment-708072107<br>
&lt;RRSAgent> I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2020/10/23-css-minutes.html fantasai<br>
&lt;florian_irc> scribenick: Florian<br>
&lt;florian_irc> fantasai: This is a follow to previous decisions on ::marker<br>
&lt;florian_irc> fantasai: we didn't want to have infinite markers<br>
&lt;florian_irc> fantasai: so you cannot have ::marker::marker<br>
&lt;florian_irc> fantasai: right now ::marker doesn't accept the display property<br>
&lt;florian_irc> fantasai: so, is ::marker::marker invalid?<br>
&lt;florian_irc> fantasai: and, in the future, if we want to allow that<br>
&lt;fantasai> s/that/display on ::marker/<br>
&lt;florian_irc> fantasai: then, do we force it to compute display so that it loses its list item<br>
&lt;florian_irc> Rossen_: so, taking things one at a time, should we allow ::marker::marker<br>
&lt;florian_irc> fantasai: I'd like to make it invalid<br>
&lt;florian_irc> TabAtkins: browsers don't support it<br>
&lt;tantek> +1 on no ::marker::marker<br>
&lt;florian_irc> oriol: implementations are behind flags, so not too relevant<br>
&lt;florian_irc> oriol: in firefox, no nested pseudos<br>
&lt;florian_irc> oriol: in chrome ::before::marker and ::after::marker work, but ::marker::marker doesn't<br>
&lt;florian_irc> oriol: but then the styles don't quite work anyway<br>
&lt;florian_irc> oriol: so I'd prefer to keep it invalid<br>
&lt;florian_irc> Rossen_: any objection to ::marker::marker being invalid<br>
&lt;florian_irc> RESOLVED: ::marker::marker is invalid<br>
&lt;florian_irc> fantasai: in the future, when display applies to ::marker, should it lose the list itemness<br>
&lt;florian_irc> oriol: seems reasonable<br>
&lt;florian_irc> Rossen_: me too<br>
&lt;florian_irc> RESOLVED: accept proposal above<br>
&lt;TabAtkins> ScribeNick: TabAtkins<br>

GitHub Notification of comment by css-meeting-bot
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1793#issuecomment-715455489 using your GitHub account

Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Friday, 23 October 2020 16:48:25 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Tuesday, 5 July 2022 06:42:21 UTC