W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-css-archive@w3.org > October 2020

Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-images] Should the values of image-orientation include the <angle> variants? (#4164)

From: CSS Meeting Bot via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2020 15:49:55 +0000
To: public-css-archive@w3.org
Message-ID: <issue_comment.created-714586824-1603381793-sysbot+gh@w3.org>
The CSS Working Group just discussed `Should the values of image-orientation include the <angle> variants?`, and agreed to the following:

* `RESOLVED: accept fantasai edits`

<details><summary>The full IRC log of that discussion</summary>
&lt;Rossen_> Topic:  Should the values of image-orientation include the &lt;angle> variants?<br>
&lt;Rossen_> github: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/4164<br>
&lt;fremy> TabAtkins: fantasai made the most recent edits, maybe she should introduce<br>
&lt;fremy> Rossen_: the discussion is long, but the relevant bits are at the end<br>
&lt;fantasai> https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/commit/ff22f40a630e2a120396d6a0f95d78e7601fb644<br>
&lt;fremy> fantasai: I made some clarifications about this<br>
&lt;fremy> fantasai: I marked the angle values as deprecated and optional for implementations<br>
&lt;fremy> fantasai: except if you want to support that previous spec<br>
&lt;fantasai> s/that previous spec/CSS-PRINT/<br>
&lt;fremy> fantasai: the property is deprecated but not optional<br>
&lt;fremy> TabAtkins: for compat reasons<br>
&lt;fremy> fantasai: I wanted to check if that was ok<br>
&lt;fremy> florian: is the print profile style relevant?<br>
&lt;fremy> fantasai: no idea<br>
&lt;fremy> fantasai: that community is not involved here anymore<br>
&lt;TabAtkins> s/deprecated but not optional/optional but not deprecated/<br>
&lt;fremy> fantasai: I would propose to finish the spec, and remove in the next level<br>
&lt;fremy> TabAtkins: yeah I don't think we don't want to take that work ourselves (as browser vendors)<br>
&lt;fremy> TabAtkins: that comes back from the times where browsers didn't respect EXIF<br>
&lt;fremy> TabAtkins: we still want the "none" value because some websites wanted that for compat<br>
&lt;fremy> TabAtkins: the angle values are not really useful I think<br>
&lt;fremy> cbiesinger: there is also a way to rotate the page, right?<br>
&lt;fremy> TabAtkins: yes, but that is very different<br>
&lt;fremy> florian: usually I care about print, but this<br>
&lt;fremy> ... I don't care<br>
&lt;fremy> Rossen_: ok, any objection?<br>
&lt;fremy> TabAtkins: why not remove?<br>
&lt;cbiesinger> s/cbiesinger/???/<br>
&lt;tantek> CSS profiles in general have kinda been left behind.<br>
&lt;fremy> fantasai: we already resolve to keep it in the spec<br>
&lt;tantek> Print profile being a deadend NOTE is fine.<br>
&lt;fremy> TabAtkins: looks at the issue<br>
&lt;faceless2> +1 to tabs wording<br>
&lt;fremy> TabAtkins: the resolution says will be dropped<br>
&lt;fremy> fantasai: ... in the next level<br>
&lt;fremy> Rossen_: let's move on<br>
&lt;fremy> TabAtkins: ah ok<br>
&lt;fremy> RESOLVED: accept fantasai edits<br>
</details>


-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by css-meeting-bot
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/4164#issuecomment-714586824 using your GitHub account


-- 
Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Thursday, 22 October 2020 15:49:57 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Tuesday, 5 July 2022 06:42:20 UTC