W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-css-archive@w3.org > October 2020

Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-conditional-3] Are there issues with !important in @supports? (Is the grammar wrong?) (#5559)

From: CSS Meeting Bot via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2020 14:23:52 +0000
To: public-css-archive@w3.org
Message-ID: <issue_comment.created-714530509-1603376630-sysbot+gh@w3.org>
The CSS Working Group just discussed `Are there issues with !important in @supports? (Is the grammar wrong?)`.

<details><summary>The full IRC log of that discussion</summary>
&lt;gregwhitworth> Topic: Are there issues with !important in @supports? (Is the grammar wrong?)<br>
&lt;astearns> github: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/5559<br>
&lt;TabAtkins> github: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/5559<br>
&lt;gregwhitworth> TabAtkins: this is going to be similar to the first one<br>
&lt;gregwhitworth> TabAtkins: syntax currently allows a bang at the end, it has no impact on the result<br>
&lt;gregwhitworth> TabAtkins: implementations that I tested ignore it consistently. Should this be confirmed that we're fine with or not?<br>
&lt;gregwhitworth> TabAtkins: Simon found it unfortunate possibly in the past? I feel we're going to lean towards consistency<br>
&lt;gregwhitworth> florian: so you can include it?<br>
&lt;gregwhitworth> TabAtkins: yes Chrome/FF do, just ignore it<br>
&lt;gregwhitworth> florian: that's good, we may have something later that people can check for that<br>
&lt;gregwhitworth> Proposed Resolution: Closed - no change<br>
&lt;gregwhitworth> Resolved: Closed - no change<br>
&lt;bkardell_> WebKit also seems green in the test<br>
&lt;gregwhitworth> chris: we're at 0 open issues, that means we'll be able to publish a CR thing outside of privacy and i18n<br>
&lt;gregwhitworth> astearns: deadline?<br>
&lt;gregwhitworth> chris: no<br>
&lt;gregwhitworth> fantasai: we can publish a crd anytime we want<br>
&lt;gregwhitworth> astearns: are there other changes?<br>
&lt;gregwhitworth> chris: every edit since 2013<br>
&lt;gregwhitworth> astearns: on some that's a short list :P<br>
&lt;gregwhitworth> astearns: should we have a crd to help others<br>
&lt;gregwhitworth> fantasai: I think it's a good idea<br>
&lt;gregwhitworth> Proposed Resolution: Publish a CRD of CSS Conditional L3<br>
&lt;gregwhitworth> Resolved:  Publish a CRD of CSS Conditional L3<br>
</details>


-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by css-meeting-bot
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/5559#issuecomment-714530509 using your GitHub account


-- 
Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Thursday, 22 October 2020 14:23:53 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Tuesday, 5 July 2022 06:42:20 UTC