- From: CSS Meeting Bot via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2020 22:35:55 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
The CSS Working Group just discussed `Cyclic percentage concept should not exist`, and agreed to the following: * `RESOLVED: accept proposed edits in https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/3010#issuecomment-672335319` <details><summary>The full IRC log of that discussion</summary> <Rossen_> Topic: Cyclic percentage concept should not exist<br> <Rossen_> github: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/3010<br> <tantek> Rossen_: fantasai you added this one<br> <tantek> fantasai: this was less of a change in behavior, and more of a change in how it was explained<br> <tantek> ... determining whether a % is cyclic is itself a bit confusing<br> <tantek> ... but not all %s are cyclic<br> <fantasai> https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/3010#issuecomment-672335319<br> <tantek> ... we tried to draft a clarification ^<br> <tantek> ... we wanted to know if that would make the spec acceptable<br> <tantek> ... we're trying to get this spec to CR soonish<br> <tantek> Rossen_: ok<br> <tantek> ... special resolution is defined after this paragraph?<br> <tantek> ... this clarification is pretty good actually<br> <tantek> ... any other opinions or feedback?<br> <tantek> (silence)<br> <tantek> dbaron: the new text looks good to me<br> <tantek> fantasai: yay!<br> <tantek> Rossen_: hearing no objections<br> <tantek> RESOLVED: accept proposed edits in https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/3010#issuecomment-672335319<br> </details> -- GitHub Notification of comment by css-meeting-bot Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/3010#issuecomment-713178995 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Tuesday, 20 October 2020 22:35:57 UTC