W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-css-archive@w3.org > October 2020

Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-sizing-4][css-contain] Clarify on specifying aspect-ratio and contain:size on replaced elements (#5550)

From: CSS Meeting Bot via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2020 22:03:18 +0000
To: public-css-archive@w3.org
Message-ID: <issue_comment.created-713166309-1603231397-sysbot+gh@w3.org>
The CSS Working Group just discussed `contain:size and 'aspect-ratio'`, and agreed to the following:

* `RESOLVED: Add an exampe, but no change to normative prose`

<details><summary>The full IRC log of that discussion</summary>
&lt;fantasai> Topic: contain:size and 'aspect-ratio'<br>
&lt;fantasai> github: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/5550<br>
&lt;fantasai> TYLin: Issue is replaced elements with intrinsic aspect ratio<br>
&lt;fantasai> TYLin: Specify contain:size and aspect-ratio, what size should it be?<br>
&lt;fantasai> TYLin: Discussion in the issue, should use expliti 'aspect-ratio' and otherwise none<br>
&lt;florian> q?<br>
&lt;fantasai> florian: My impression is that spec was confusing because we didn't say anything at all, but if we clarify as we did in the earlier issue, do we need to say anything else to make this work?<br>
&lt;fantasai> TabAtkins: It does fall out, but might be worth an example<br>
&lt;fantasai> fantasai: I think it falls out<br>
&lt;fantasai> TYLin: added testcase<br>
&lt;fantasai> astearns: so proposal is to add an example<br>
&lt;fantasai> astearns: any objections?<br>
&lt;fantasai> RESOLVED: Add an exampe, but no change to normative prose<br>
</details>


-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by css-meeting-bot
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/5550#issuecomment-713166309 using your GitHub account


-- 
Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Tuesday, 20 October 2020 22:03:20 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Tuesday, 5 July 2022 06:42:20 UTC