W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-css-archive@w3.org > October 2020

Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-sizing-3][css-images-3] Distinguish intrinsic size's two definitions with two terms (#4961)

From: fantasai via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2020 21:56:21 +0000
To: public-css-archive@w3.org
Message-ID: <issue_comment.created-708031126-1602626180-sysbot+gh@w3.org>
HTML spec seems to use the term “natural width” and “natural height” for the first concept https://html.spec.whatwg.org/multipage/embedded-content.html#the-img-element

So maybe “natural size” for the intrinsic size of replaced elements and “intrinsic size”for the content-based sizes?
A few other options from the thesaurus include “inherent”, “innate”, “essential”, and “inbuilt”. Maybe “inbuilt” since we're talking about sizing information built into the replaced element...?

-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by fantasai
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/4961#issuecomment-708031126 using your GitHub account


-- 
Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Tuesday, 13 October 2020 21:56:23 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Tuesday, 5 July 2022 06:42:20 UTC