W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-css-archive@w3.org > October 2020

Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-sizing-3][css-images-3] Distinguish intrinsic size's two definitions with two terms (#4961)

From: fantasai via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2020 21:56:21 +0000
To: public-css-archive@w3.org
Message-ID: <issue_comment.created-708031126-1602626180-sysbot+gh@w3.org>
HTML spec seems to use the term “natural width” and “natural height” for the first concept https://html.spec.whatwg.org/multipage/embedded-content.html#the-img-element

So maybe “natural size” for the intrinsic size of replaced elements and “intrinsic size”for the content-based sizes?
A few other options from the thesaurus include “inherent”, “innate”, “essential”, and “inbuilt”. Maybe “inbuilt” since we're talking about sizing information built into the replaced element...?

GitHub Notification of comment by fantasai
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/4961#issuecomment-708031126 using your GitHub account

Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Tuesday, 13 October 2020 21:56:23 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Tuesday, 5 July 2022 06:42:20 UTC